[Originally posted December 10, 2008, and inspired by this Newsweek cover article by Lisa Miller.]
The Biblical patriarchs had as many wives and concubines as they could afford. In fact, polygamy was (and I daresay is) the ideal for People of the Book (and having multiple wives, technically, is polygyny -- "The More You Know"!). Poor people tended toward monogamy solely because they couldn't afford more bitches. (And I use "bitches" in this post only because the Bible treats women on par with female dogs: as a male's property. Hell, only a handful of women in the entire Bible are even bothered to be named. You get maybe a thousand male names from all the chapters/verses regarding all the begetting and begetting and begetting, but essentially no female names. And the begetting was a lot tougher on them.)
I fervently believe traditional marriage must be restored. Still, I'm a modern guy. I bend with the times. I don't think we have to go back to making women chattel. Also, I don't get money mixed up in my relationships. Especially now that I, personally, don't have any to speak of.
Tacks (brass): I want ten wives (starters) who pay for anything and everything I want to do/to have/need/merely want.
But that's me. A real traditionalist.
But I know a lot of people out there are fighting for traditional marriage as taught by Jesus: a union of one man and one woman.
The problem being that Jesus never said, never gave any indication, that this is what marriage is supposed to be. In fact, since Jesus was a Jewish man of his times, he would have been more than OK with polygamy.
Jesus believed the end of the world was at hand. By example, he taught celibacy. He did so, in part, likely because in a nonexistent world a family doesn't need kids to ensure its prosperity. As part of this apocalyptic view, Jesus encouraged people to leave their families to follow him and, generally, not to care about these families because they were earthly things, soon to be rendered unimportant by God's appearance on earth, which he did often say was at hand (as in during his lifetime or shortly thereafter).
So Christians who follow Jesus's actual teaching should desert their families, if they have them, (but not get divorced). And if they don't have families, they shouldn't marry at all.
The family values Christianity currently teaches are the exact opposite of those Jesus taught (in essence: the family has no value whatsoever). Preachers go on and on about the family being the bedrock of civilization.
Such preaching couldn't be more anti-Christian.
If Christian preachers get what they want -- Jesus's family values imposed on America -- the result will be the annihilation of our concept of family.
Personally, I don't need nor want that. I'd be fine, simply, with ten wives.
...At least for starters.
27 September, 2009
Jesus's Family Values
Posted by Andy Rooney at 12:24 PM
Labels: bandini, bible, calvin bandini, christianity, essay, family values, fibromyalgian, jesus, judaism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Have you even read the bible?
And He answered and said to them, “Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.”
Matthew 19:4-6
The Bible contradicts itself at every turn, it seems.
Luke 14:26: If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.
That's one of the passages that informed this post.
Post a Comment